Technology X Tomorrow's Technology Today!
ADDITIONAL PICTURES
Auto f/9, 1/320, ISO 100, 18-55mm 18mm:
Auto f/8, 1/250. ISO 100, 18-55mm 55mm:
Details at 55mm 100% crop:
You might be able to notice very slight chromatic aberration on the edges. It’s very minor and certainly a lot better for most ‘SuperZoom’ point-and-shoots on the market. Chromatic aberrations do show up a little more on very small details like tree branches in the distance.
Colours are bright and vivid. The D3200 sometimes overexposes in high contrast scenes. For the most part the camera is very good and quick at exposing scenes automatically.
Auto f/9, 1/320. ISO 100, 18-55mm 18mm:
Portraits are fun and easy to take but kids and pets can always be a challenge. To help combat this another added upgrade from its predecessor is the EXPEED 3. This processor lets you take 4fps at full 24MP resolution while shooting RAW. The second the D3200 powers on you can instantly take continuous photos. with good light even photos of hyper toddlers should be a snap.
f/5.6, 1/60, ISO 1100, Fill-Flash 55mm:
Auto f/4, 1/125 sec, ISO 250, 22mm Fill-flash:
Great post and photos. I couldn’t decide whether to opt for the D3200 or
the D5100. See my musings here. Be interested if eveyone agrees with my
verdict! Cheers James
While the Nikon D3200 is the newest entry level DSLR from Nikon, overall I think the D3100 is still the better entry level DSLR camera. While there more pixels on the D3200, they are half the size of the pixels on the D3100. \
@Menshealth99 Honestly I never really got the chance to play with the D3100 too much, I like some of the newer features of the D3200 over the D3100. Pixel size aside both cameras are practically the same. and you are guaranteed decent shots even as a novice photographer. I will have to compare the two cameras one day for a head to head breakdown.
Thanks foe the reply
yeah..we should have just one but big pixel, right?